Disturbing Questions about Chantal’s
Case
By
Len J. Forrester
The Federal government have confiscated between 11 and 12
million dollars in money. They have
also taken the 2 million dollars William & Chantal paid in Taxes. The million dollar special fund set up
at the government’s wishes for monetary refunds still has about $700,000 left in
but the government are not giving any refunds out of it.
The money William & Chantal made never came from
drugs or organized crime where there is no way of tracing where it came
from. It came from a Telemarketing
Business that employed 400 genuine employees. There are cheques & credit card
stubs to prove where nearly every dollar came from.
If this money is really illegal and every person who sent
for the program was a victim as the government says, whether they asked for
their money back or not, why have they (the government) not returned the money
to whom it came from? If a bank
robber were caught with the money it would be returned to the back. If an insurance fraudster were caught,
the money would be returned to the insurance company.
Even if Chantal & William had been sued in a civil
action (which this should have been) and been found guilty, people would have
got their money back. But because
the Government prosecuted the case, they have taken all the money. Who are the thieves in this
case?
Again I stress this is not organized crime; this is
Telemarketing, which is a way of life in the U.S.A.
Another part of their sentence that escapes all rational
understanding is that the majority of William & Chantal’s sentence is
reached at by the 30 money laundering charges that were doubled up under two
different statutes to make 60 charges all carrying their own number of years
punishment. My question is what
would their sentence have been if instead of transferring the seven million
dollars to the Cayman Islands in 30 transactions, William had transferred the
amount in one lump sum. Would this
have made just two charges of money laundering instead of 60?